Print Page   |   Report Abuse
News & Press: SAFLII

Income Tax Case No 11283

26 October 2007   (0 Comments)
Posted by: TaxFind™
Share |

In the matter between A LTD - Appellant and  the commissioner for the South African Revenue Service - Respondent

Mini Summary

The appellant had held a 98% interest in a subsidiary company, via its 60% controlling interest in another company (C).The 98% shareholding was intended to be an investment.Later in the relevant tax year, the appellant acquired a 15.6% interest in the same subsidiary, but later sold that interest to C for less than half the amount paid.In the relevant tax return, the appellant claimed as a loss, a deduction equal to the difference between the amount of the purchase of the shares and the sale.In support of the deduction, the appellant stated that the loss was of a speculative nature and therefore deductible.The respondent disallowed the deduction on the basis that it was of a capital nature.

Held that the appellant had failed to discharge the onus of showing that it acquired the shareholding in the subsidiary company either as a scheme of profit-making or as trading stock.Instead, the evidence showed that the shares were acquired and held as a capital investment.The appeal was dismissed.

To view full decision click here


WHY REGISTER WITH SAIT?

Section 240A of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) requires that all tax practitioners register with a recognized controlling body before 1 July 2013. It is a criminal offense to not register with both a recognized controlling body and SARS.

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO REGISTER

The Act requires that a minimum academic and practical requirments be set to register with a controlling body. Click here for the minimum requirements of SAIT.

Membership Management Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal