Print Page   |   Report Abuse
News & Press: Taxbreaks

CGT on Conversion From non-par to par value Shares

29 February 2012   (0 Comments)
Posted by: Author: Stephen Spamer and Arnaaz Camay
Share |

CGT on Conversion From Non-par to par value Shares

The CGT treatment hinges on  whether there a difference in rights between the old non-par shares and the new par value shares after conversion.

With the introduction of the Companies Act No. 71 of 2008 with effect from 1 May 2011, South African companies may convert their existing par value shares into no par value shares.Does this voluntary conversion trigger a‘disposal’ of an ‘asset’ for Capital Gains Tax (CGT) purposes and thereby give rise to a liability for CGT in the hands of the shareholder?

In terms of the Eighth Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1962, an‘asset’ is widely defined and includes a right or interest of whatever nature to or in moveable,immovable, corporeal, and incorporeal property.In Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd & another v Ocean Commodities Inc. &Others, Corbett JA stated that "a share in a company consists of a bundle, or conglomerate, of personal rights entitling the holder thereof to a certain interest in the company, its assets and dividends”.

Accordingly, from  a  shareholder's perspective, the rights  attaching  to a  share include the right to vote, the right to dividends and the right to participate in the winding up of a company.

If there is a ‘disposal’ of any of these rights attaching to a share, a CGT event will take place, which could potentially result in tax liability in the hands of the shareholder. A ‘disposal’ is also widely defined and includes any disposal of an asset including, inter alia, a variation, conversion or exchange of an asset. In terms of Issue 3 of the Comprehensive

Guide to Capital Gains Tax:
•the  word ‘variation’  must  be  interpreted in  the  context of the disposal of an asset, i.e. the principle is that a person  must have disposed of an asset in the sense of having parted with the whole or a portion of it;
•a conversion involves a substantive change in the rights attaching to an asset; and
•an  exchange  of  an  asset is  similar  to  a  barter  transaction, it  requires  disposing of  one  asset  in exchange for another.

The key question is, therefore,whether there is a difference between the rights of the par value shares and the rights of the non-par value shares once converted.If there is no difference, or if there is no substantive difference or change in the rights, there will be no‘disposal’ for CGT purposes.

It should be possible to ensure that the rights of the no par value shares are the same as the rights of the par value shares, the conversion from a par value share to a non-par value share should not result in a variation, conversion, or exchange as contemplated by the 8th Schedule.

It is important to distinguish between the rights attaching to the share and the contractual rights of the shareholders.A voluntary conversion from par value shares to non-par value shares would not necessarily change these contractual rights, and any variation to the contractual rights would need to be considered and evaluated separately.

Source: By Stephen Spamer and Arnaaz Camay (Tax breaks)


Section 240A of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) requires that all tax practitioners register with a recognized controlling body before 1 July 2013. It is a criminal offense to not register with both a recognized controlling body and SARS.


The Act requires that a minimum academic and practical requirments be set to register with a controlling body. Click here for the minimum requirements of SAIT.

Membership Management Software Powered by®  ::  Legal