Print Page   |   Report Abuse
News & Press: Taxbreaks

The Budget in Bite-Sized Chunks

31 March 2012   (0 Comments)
Posted by: Author: Johann Jacobs
Share |

Estate Planning And Deceased Estates

From an estate planning and deceased estate perspective, the 2012 budget was on critical analysis much more eventful than it appears at first blush.The most prominent tax currently payable pursuant to the death of an individual is estate duty in terms of the Estate Duty Act 45 of 1955 as amended (sometimes quaintly referred to as "death duties”).

In essence, currently estate duty is payable at a flat rate of 20% on your net estate (in other words,after payment of all liabilities) over R3.5 million.

There appears to have been a general move towards the relaxation of estate duty, if one has reference to the threshold which rose from R1 million in 1988 to R3.5 million in 2007—given that the increase is compensation in excess of what is required to counter the effect of inflation on the value of money.With the introduction of the so-called "portable estate duty” in the 2009 budget (which came into working on 1 January 2010), the threshold for estate duty was effectively raised to R7 million per couple.

The pattern seemed to hint at the possible abolishment of the tax.This has led to much speculation,but the topic remains a sticky point—more so, however, for ideological reasons than fiscal reasons.

It is well recorded that estate duty collected under the auspice of the Act does not (in comparison to other taxes) yield a substantial contribution to the reserve of the tax collectors.It is estimated that estate duty as measured against the total tax revenue collected for the period 2008-2010 presents a meagre 0.12% of taxes falling into the coffers.

With the introduction of Capital Gains Tax (CGT) on 1 October 2001, estate duty became an onerous form of double taxation which gave fuel to the argument for the abolishment thereof.Estate duty has given rise to the creation of highly complex structures and the existence of a secondary industry, resulting in negative spending to avoid the payment of estate duty. To some the whole exercise seems a waste of productive time and resources.In fact, this was stated by the minister to be a motivation for the introduction of the "portable estate duty” provisions.

A glimmer of hope for the abolishment of estate duty was contained in the Minister's Budget Speech of 2010 when he stated: "Both estate duty and Capital Gains Tax are payable on death, which is perceived as giving rise to double taxation.The estate duty raises limited revenue and is cumbersome to administer. Moreover, its efficacy is questionable: many wealthy individuals escape estate duty liability through trusts and other means.Taxes upon death will be revised.”

This theme was taken up and spelt out unambiguously in the2011 budget speech, with the Minister stating that estate duty was being reviewed and several options were under consideration.Most commentators are in agreement that if estate duty were to be abolished, one such consideration would be that it would be replaced—and the obvious choice has been possible changes to CGT, which is levied in terms of the 8th Schedule to the Income Tax Act.Such a dispensation could counter both ideological and fiscal arguments for the retention of estate duty.

The regime would have to be extended in respect of one or more aspects, namely the extension of the group of assets that fall into the Capital Gains Tax net, the increase of the inclusion rate, and/or the increase of the tax payable to align the actual effective rate of the tax to donations tax and estate duty,which is currently at 20%.CGT is relevant to estate planning, firstly because it becomes payable on all those assets which are included assets for CGT purposes during one's life on the basis that it becomes automatically payable on death in terms of a so called  "deeming” provision. In fact, there can be two CGT events—the first being the gain in respect of the value of the assets from the date of acquisition and the date of death, and the second being the gain or loss between date of death and the date of realisation if sold during the administration of the estate.

However, despite the afore mentioned development, I could not find a single reference to estate duty in general or specifically, and it is anybody's guess as to the progress  of the reviews that are being undertaken by whatever body has been designated with this task, or even what the current thoughts are.But maybe the answer lies in the substantial announcements made by the Minister in relation to CGT. He has proposed that the inclusion rate in respect of which gains are taxed be increased from 25% to 33.3% (in the case of individuals).Effectively the actual tax payable at the highest tax rate will now be 13.3% of the actual gain, as opposed to 10%.

A possible interpretation is that although the 2012 Budget speech did make a single direct reference to estate duty or mention it by name, the first extension of the capital gains tax regime since 2001 may have just signalled the first confirmation of the demise of estate duty, and its replacement by a comprehensive and augmented capital gains tax system.

Source: By Johann Jacobs (Tax breaks)


WHY REGISTER WITH SAIT?

Section 240A of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) requires that all tax practitioners register with a recognized controlling body before 1 July 2013. It is a criminal offense to not register with both a recognized controlling body and SARS.

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO REGISTER

The Act requires that a minimum academic and practical requirments be set to register with a controlling body. Click here for the minimum requirements of SAIT.

Membership Management Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal