Print Page   |   Report Abuse
News & Press: Taxbreaks

How Much Tax Info Can a Country Request on You?

30 April 2012   (0 Comments)
Posted by: Author: Tim Desmond
Share |

How Much Tax Info Can a Country Request on You?

South Africa has concluded double tax agreements with a number of countries. The primary purpose of these agreements is generally regarded as the prevention of double taxation. The agreements essentially divide up the taxing right s between the contracting countries, in situations where they might both claim such rights. There is, however, another purpose to these agreements—that is, the prevention of tax evasion by taxpayers of the contracting countries.

The prevention of tax evasion aspect requires the exchange of information by the two tax authorities. In the case of the Commissioner: SARS v Werner van Kets, the Western Cape High Court considered some practical aspects of information exchanges.

The Australian Tax Office(ATO) requested information from SARS on a person suspected of evading his Australian tax obligations. The request was made in terms of the applicable double tax agreement.  The information was known to a South African resident: Werner van Kets.In seeking the information from van Kets, SARS relied on provisions of the South African Income Tax Act requiring the furnishing of information to SARS.

However, SARS’ request was refused by van Kets, who argued that the provisions of the Income Tax Act did not apply in the circumstances. He contended that they only applied to information required in respect of a South African taxpayer. On that basis, the provisions could not be utilised to obtain information on an Australian taxpayer.

A strict reading of the relevant provisions appeared to favour van Kets' contentions. SARS, however, argued for a wider interpretation. In terms of South African law, a double tax agreement approved by Parliament has the force of South African legislation. SARS therefore contended that the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act had to be read in the context of the information exchange provisions of the double tax agreement. If a strict interpretation was applied, SARS would practically have no way of obtaining information requested by the ATO.

The High Court accepted SARS' arguments. It found that the provisions of the double tax agreement and the Income Tax Act should, if at all possible, be reconciled and read as a coherent whole. This required that the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act be applied to all taxpayers falling within the scope of the double tax agreement—including Australian taxpayers. SARS’ information request was therefore valid, and van Kets was ordered to comply with it.

Source: By Tim Desmond (Tax breaks)


Section 240A of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) requires that all tax practitioners register with a recognized controlling body before 1 July 2013. It is a criminal offense to not register with both a recognized controlling body and SARS.


The Act requires that a minimum academic and practical requirments be set to register with a controlling body. Click here for the minimum requirements of SAIT.

Membership Management Software Powered by®  ::  Legal