Print Page   |   Report Abuse
News & Press: International News

Hedging through the tax charge: a threat to tax revenue

17 March 2013   (0 Comments)
Posted by: SAIT Technical
Share |

By Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

Risk management and hedging are key issues in corporate management. In certain cases, taxpayers may see an opportunity or a need to factor taxation into their hedging transactions to be fully hedged on an after-tax basis.

Aggressive tax planning (ATP) schemes based on after-tax hedging pose a threat to countries’ revenue base. Empirical evidence suggests that hundreds of millions of USD are at stake, with a number of multi-billion transactions identified by countries. This type of ATP schemes originated in the banking sector, but experience shows that they are also used in other industries and, in some instances, also by medium-sized enterprises, thus generating an even bigger threat to tax revenue. Any country that taxes the results of a hedging instrument differently from the results of the hedged transaction/risk is potentially exposed to such schemes.

Following on from the OECD’s report Corporate Loss Utilisation through Aggressive Tax Planning (2011), Aggressive Tax Planning Based on After-Tax Hedging describes the features of ATP schemes based on after-tax hedging as well as the strategies used to detect and respond to those schemes. The report, which draws from schemes submitted to the OECD Directory on Aggressive Tax Planning, also highlights a number of challenges from a compliance and policy perspective.

The report recognises that not all after-tax hedging arrangements are aggressive and that after-tax hedging in and of itself is not an issue, thus recommending countries to adopt a balanced approach in their response to after-tax hedging. In recent years, however, a number of countries have encountered ATP schemes in which taxpayers use after-tax hedging to make higher returns, without actually bearing the associated risk which is in effect passed on to the government. In all of these schemes, there is generally no pre-existing exposure to hedge against but rather the exposure is created as part of the relevant scheme.

The report is another example of what enhanced international co-operation in tax matters can bring about. Countries shared information and other intelligence on ATP schemes based on after-tax hedging, allowing them to detect such schemes and respond to them in a timely manner.

For further information, please contact Achim Pross ( at + 33 1 45 24 98 92 or Raffaele Russo ( + 33 1 45 24 19 06 in the OECD’s Centre for Tax Policy and Administration.


Section 240A of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) requires that all tax practitioners register with a recognized controlling body before 1 July 2013. It is a criminal offense to not register with both a recognized controlling body and SARS.


The Act requires that a minimum academic and practical requirments be set to register with a controlling body. Click here for the minimum requirements of SAIT.

Membership Management Software Powered by®  ::  Legal