Print Page   |   Report Abuse
News & Press: Opinion

UK Capital Gains Tax ‘is Bad News for SA'

08 January 2014   (0 Comments)
Posted by: Author: Amanda Visser
Share |

Author: Amanda Visser (BDlive)

South Africans with property in the UK will in future be liable for capital gains tax there once they sell their property, following an announcement last month that the tax will be introduced in the UK from April next year.

The South African economy is likely to lose revenue because of the step, as the UK would in future be getting the tax instead of South Africa, Michael Honiball, partner in the tax department of law firm Webber Wentzel, said on Tuesday.

South Africa’s domestic laws, besides its double tax treaties, provide for double tax relief, crediting South African taxpayers for tax paid in a foreign jurisdiction. The rate of capital gains tax on the gains made by nonresidents, such as South Africans, in the UK will be 28%, compared with the 13.3% they are charged in South Africa.

South Africans now pay 13.3% on the gains of property sold in the UK to the South African fiscus. From next year, they will pay 28% in the UK and 13.3% in South Africa, but due to the double tax relief they will only pay capital gains tax in the UK because of the higher rate in the UK, Mr Honiball said.

"Although they will be paying more tax than before, it is doubtful that it would impact on their decision to buy property in the UK ."The announcement reverses an almost 50-year-old policy that allowed individuals, whether British expatriates or overseas buyers, to invest directly in UK property without paying tax on any gains once the property was sold, said Rupert Worsdale, tax partner with advisory firm Maitland in South Africa on Monday. UK Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne made the announcement.

Mr Worsdale said the UK government aimed to increase revenue and to prevent a London property bubble. "A number of commentators are suggesting that the new rules would lead to a reduced appetite for high-end residential property.

"This is doubtful, as London residential property is regarded as a safe-haven asset and the new tax is unlikely to change this."

Mr Honiball said the decision to introduce capital gains tax on nonresidents in the UK was not unusual. "It has been unusual for them not to have had capital gains tax imposed on foreigners."

In most foreign jurisdictions Britons pay capital gains tax if they own and sell property. In South Africa they are charged capital gains tax at a rate of 13.3%.

"They are simply conforming to global best practice where gains on immovable property are taxed in the place where it is," Mr Honiball said. "Therefore, the move is not unexpected ."

Mr Worsdale said there was anecdotal evidence of many South Africans with property in the UK, although the value or number of their assets are unknown. The UK does not keep record of the nationalities of property buyers.

The South African Reserve Bank, which governs exchange control regulations, allows South Africans to invest up to R4m abroad. In addition, up to R1m, within the single discretionary allowance facility, can be transferred abroad.

Mr Worsdale said South Africans with property in the UK would have to have their assets valued before April 6 next year to provide for a base cost from where gains could be calculated.

Mr Honiball said the aim with the tax was to keep property prices down in central London where rich foreigners had been buying up bargains because of the "no (capital gains) tax system". This had pushed locals out of the property market.

"It will, of course, bring extra revenue, but the stated intention is for it to equal the playing field for foreigners and locals."

The UK imposed capital gains tax from April 1 last year on high-value residential property (more than £2m) owned by a company or other corporate bodies.

Mr Worsdale said that the latest proposal was likely to apply to all nonresidents, including individuals and trustees. In addition, it would apply to all residential properties, irrespective of their value.

This article first appeared on


Section 240A of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) requires that all tax practitioners register with a recognized controlling body before 1 July 2013. It is a criminal offense to not register with both a recognized controlling body and SARS.


The Act requires that a minimum academic and practical requirments be set to register with a controlling body. Click here for the minimum requirements of SAIT.

Membership Management Software Powered by®  ::  Legal