Implications of the carbon offsets paper
26 May 2014
Posted by: Author: Danielle Botha
Authors: Danielle Botha and Nicole Paulsen (CliffeDekkerHofmeyr)
On 29 April 2014, the National Treasury published the Carbon
Offsets Paper (Paper) for public comment. This paper outlines proposals for a
carbon offset scheme that will enable businesses to lower their carbon tax
liability and enter into investments that will reduce greenhouse gas (GHG)
At the 2009 UN Climate Change Conference, South Africa voluntarily
committed to reduce its GHG emissions by 34% by 2020 and 42% by 2025,
In response to this commitment, in 2011, South Africa adopted the
national climate-change response policy, which comprises of a ‘package’ of measures
designed to deal with both the reduction of GHG emissions (mitigation) and to
ensure climate-change resilience through public investments (adaptation).
The introduction of this climate-change ‘package’ was
announced in the 2012 and 2013 Budgets. It was further proposed that carbon tax
would be implemented in 2014 at a rate of R120 per ton of CO2 on direct
emissions. This rate was to be increased at 10% per year during the first implementation
phase. Following these proposals, the 2013 Budget proposed the implementation of
carbon tax effective 1 January 2015, in accordance with the previously
After public consultation however, the National Treasury and
the Department of Environmental Affairs agreed to align the design of the carbon
tax and proposed emission reduction outcomes.
Consequently, the implementation of carbon tax has been
postponed to 2016 to allow for this process of realignment as well as to ensure
that there is adequate time for consultation on draft legislation. The
postponement of carbon tax implementation was interesting in light of the failure
of carbon taxes in Australia.
The carbon offset scheme is meant to complement the carbon
tax that South Africa plans to introduce from 2016.
What is a ‘carbon
The World Resources Institute defines a carbon offset as "a
unit of carbon dioxide-equivalent that is reduced, avoided, or sequestered to
compensate for emissions occurring elsewhere”. A carbon offset can also be described
as a monetary investment in a project or activity elsewhere that abates GHG
emissions or sequesters carbon from the atmosphere that is used to compensate
for GHG emissions from your own activities. Offsets can be bought by a business
or individual in the voluntary market (or within a trading scheme) and one carbon
offset usually represents one ton of carbon dioxide-equivalent.
The Kyoto Protocol has sanctioned offsets as a way for
governments and private companies to earn carbon credits that can be traded on
a marketplace. Essentially a carbon offset is an activity that compensates for
the emission of carbon dioxide or other GHGs by providing for an emission
reduction elsewhere. Carbon offsets enable firms to cost-effectively lower
their carbon tax liability through financial support of projects that reduce
the emission of GHGs in the short- or long-term. Carbon offsets are proposed to
drive investment in GHG projects which may in turn generate considerable sustainable
development benefits in South Africa.
For the effective implementation of a carbon offset mechanism,
the Paper proposes the following eligibility criteria for carbon offset
encourage the development of locally-based projects and GHG mitigation in South
Africa, only South African-based credits will be eligible for use within the
carbon offsets scheme;
prevent double counting of the carbon reduction benefit, only projects that
generate carbon offset credits must occur outside the scope of activities that
are subject to the carbon tax;
- A list of eligible projects will be introduced as
a starting point to provide certainty and stimulate investment decisions and
project development in the carbon offsets market. A list of ineligible projects
will also be introduced so as to include projects that would be implemented
within the scope of taxable activities following the introduction of the carbon
- Projects that have little co-benefits and low value, such as the mitigation of
industrial gasses, should also be excluded; and
- Projects registered or implemented prior to the introduction of the carbon tax
regime will be accepted to the scheme, subject to the fulfilment of specified
According to the Paper, an analysis of GHG-mitigation potential
in various areas could be used to determine priority areas, where the development
of carbon offset projects should be incentivised. It is important to note in
this regard that the project types should be included based on their positive
impact towards the transition to a low-carbon economy, climate change response as
well as sustainable development benefits.
Accordingly, the Paper has identified
the following areas as priority areas for the development of carbon offset projects:
- Energy and energy efficiency;
- Agriculture, forestry and other land uses; and
Based on the eligibility criteria set out above, it is clear
that there are specific carbon offset project types that would be excluded from
the scheme. These would essentially include projects that would be developed
inside the carbon tax net. These project types are specifically excluded in
order to prevent a potential double counting of financial benefits that could
increase distortions in the carbon credit marketplace, with the entity generating
the credits potentially being able to sell the credits to other entities for
lower prices than projects in sectors that are not covered by the tax. Projects
benefiting from other government incentives should also be excluded.
Accordingly, projects that could potentially result in a
double incentive will therefore not be allowed. These projects would specifically include -
- Energy efficiency projects implemented on activities that are owned or
controlled by companies that are covered by the carbon tax;
- Projects that benefit from the Energy Efficiency Tax Incentive;
- Cogeneration of renewable energy projects implemented
on activities that are owned or controlled by companies that are covered by the
- Fuel-switch projects implemented on activities that are owned or controlled by
companies that are covered by the carbon tax; and
- Renewable energy projects developed under the Renewable Energy Independent
Power Producer Programme (REIPPP).
Carbon offsetting has gained some momentum mainly among consumers
in western countries who have become aware and concerned about the potentially
negative environmental effects of energy-intensive lifestyles and economies.
Accordingly, the use of carbon offsets to reduce the carbon
tax liability for South African entities would mirror current trends in a
number of jurisdictions that employ economic instruments to reduce GHG emissions.
The National Treasury, the Department of Environmental
Affairs and the Department of Energy have invited the public to comment on the
Paper by 30 June 2014.
This article first appeared on cliffedekkerhofmeyr.co.za.