Print Page   |   Report Abuse
News & Press: Opinion

AMSA lobbies Treasury for ‘special' carbon tax arrangement

03 June 2014   (0 Comments)
Posted by: Author: Natalie Greve
Share |

Author: Natalie Greve (Polity)

South African steel producer ArcelorMittal South Africa (AMSA) is currently lobbying National Treasury around the country’s proposed carbon tax, appealing that large-scale industrial steel manufacturers be exempt from the proposed carbon tax and rather be beholden to a separate, "special” arrangement.

Speaking to the media at the launch of the company’s Factor Report on Wednesday, AMSA group manager Siegfried Spanig said the carbon tax, if implemented in its current form, would cost the country’s largest steel supplier between R630-million and R650-million a year.

"For a company that’s struggling at this stage, as all steelmakers are, this is a big challenge and is not a financially sustainable solution,” he commented, adding that this amount was based on a taxable base of only 70% to 75% of the group’s carbon emissions.

Acknowledging that the group was openly opposed to the tax, Spanig noted that engagements with Treasury had, thus far, been "open and positive”, but that further consultation was required.

"Iron and steelmakers don’t have many options available to them to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) [emissions]. I’m not saying that we can’t do anything about it, but, in terms of our direct emissions, there is not much that we can do.

"The steel industry needs a special [carbon tax] arrangement, [even though] we still don’t know exactly what the carbon regulations will be yet,” he said.

Spanig added that, should a carbon tax be imposed on domestically manufactured steel, South African suppliers would have to compete against imported steel products from countries that were not similarly taxed, thus, encumbering local competitiveness.

In a move that invited criticism from environmental tax proponents, then Finance MinisterPravin Gordhan announced to Parliament in March that, while a "package” of measures – including a carbon tax – was required to address climate change and reduce carbon emissions, the implementation of these interventions had been postponed by a year to 2016 to "allow for further consultation”.

"Following public consultation, National Treasury and the Department of Environmental Affairs agreed on the need to align the design of the carbon tax and the proposed desired emission-reduction outcomes (DEROs).

"To allow for this process and [to] ensure adequate time for consultation on draft legislation, implementation of the carbon tax is postponed to 2016,” he said during his 2014 National Budget speech.

The DEROs, as mentioned in the National Climate Change Response Policy, considered [industrial] sectors that played a vital role in the country’s emissions space and identified possible interventions that could bring about an emissions adjustment in these sectors.

It was under this mechanism that AMSA hoped to negotiate a lower taxable emissions base.

"It makes sense that some alignment needs to take place between the carbon tax and the DEROs. At this point, we are very concerned about the carbon tax, but the door is open at Treasury for us to negotiate,” Spanig asserted.

Factor Report

Meanwhile, Spanig said the group’s Factor Report had shown that it had made good progress on reducing its dust emissions following the commissioning of a R250-million sinter abatement system at its Vanderbijlpark plant, whichhad reduced particulate emissions to 25 000 t.

The report, commissioned by AMSA chairperson Mpho Makwana and executed in collaboration with senior AMSA experts and consulting firm Boston Consulting Group, sought to measure and assess the social, environmental and economic impact of the group on the country in general.

AMSA would use the material produced to inform its future strategies and stakeholder engagements.

The report also showed that AMSA’s CO2 emissions remained significant, with the company emitting 15.2-million tonnes in 2013.

"You can’t be responsible for 60% of the country’s steel supply without emitting these levels of CO2,” Makwana explained.

He added, however, that the company would continually look at ways of improving its environmental, social and economic footprint.

This article first appeared on


Section 240A of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) requires that all tax practitioners register with a recognized controlling body before 1 July 2013. It is a criminal offense to not register with both a recognized controlling body and SARS.


The Act requires that a minimum academic and practical requirments be set to register with a controlling body. Click here for the minimum requirements of SAIT.

Membership Management Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal