Print Page   |   Report Abuse
News & Press: Opinion

SARS boss suspended again after court relief

08 January 2015   (0 Comments)
Posted by: Author: Natasha Marrian
Share |

Author: Natasha Marrian (BDlive)

The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has upped the ante in its bid to discipline its staffers, suspending senior executive Peter Richer for the second time. It has accused him of lying and of tampering with evidence.

It has appointed KPMG to investigate Mr Richer, SARS head of strategic planning and risk, whose initial suspension was withdrawn by the Labour Court last month and reinstated by SARS on Wednesday.

Deputy commissioner Ivan Pillay also had his suspension lifted by the court and five other officials were suspended or resigned in the wake of an investigation by an advocate, Muzi Sikhakhane, into an alleged covert unit that had reportedly spied on President Jacob Zuma and run a brothel.

Mr Sikhakhane’s report will be tabled in Parliament next month. SARS said on Wednesday that it would only be made public after all "internal and external" processes had been concluded. The tax agency hinted that it expected the report to face a legal challenge.

Mr Pillay has been given until Monday to provide reasons why he should not be suspended.

According to his suspension letter, signed by SARS executive for employment relations Luther Lebelo, Mr Richer’s explanation for his involvement in the covert unit was "deceptive" and "devoid of any truth".

"Your submission is littered with half-truths and illustrates an unquenched intention to mislead and further hide the truth," Mr Lebelo wrote. He accused Mr Richer of being involved in procuring equipment used recently by the unit, tampering with evidence and misleading SARS about the nature of the equipment.

SARS spokeswoman Marika Muller on Wedneday declined to say whether there would be further suspensions or disciplinary steps.

There are fears that the disciplinary action — initiated by SARS Commissioner Tom Moyane after his appointment in September — is rooted in rivalry between state institutions, particularly in the security cluster; and serves as a cover for political and factional interests and corrupt politicians and civil servants.

Mr Moyane said he was acting on the Sikhakhane report. In court papers challenging the suspensions and in submissions on the report Mr Pillay labelled its findings as "flawed in fact and law".

The report found "prima facie evidence" for the existence of the covert unit. But Mr Pillay said this finding was made without "critically evaluating all the available evidence and assessing the weight and veracity which should be attached to the evidence".

The panel led by Mr Sikhakhane had "failed to make findings of fact, failed to fulfil its mandate and no reliance could or should be placed upon its report", he said.

The Sikhakhane panel had been established by Mr Pillay himself when he was SARS acting commissioner to investigate allegations that its enforcement head Johann van Loggerenberg had revealed confidential taxpayer information to Belinda Walters, an attorney acting for the tobacco industry. Mr van Loggerenberg has also been suspended.

Mr Pillay argued that the panel had irregularly expanded its terms of reference to include the alleged covert unit. He said the panel had not interviewed key witnesses — including former SARS commissioner Pravin Gordhan and former finance minister Trevor Manuel — who he claimed had given the go-ahead for the establishment of the unit.

It had "ignored, overlooked or did not consider significant amounts of evidence presented to it", Mr Pillay said.

The panel had erroneously relied on untested allegations from "certain quarters including the media" to conclude that a covert unit existed, he said.

Mr Moyane said in court papers defending Mr Pillay’s suspension that the covert unit did exist; that Mr Pillay had failed to take the commissioner into his confidence about its existence; that it may have abused its powers; had been involved in rogue behaviour and that it remained a threat to the stability of SARS.

This article first appeared on bdlive.co.za.


WHY REGISTER WITH SAIT?

Section 240A of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) requires that all tax practitioners register with a recognized controlling body before 1 July 2013. It is a criminal offense to not register with both a recognized controlling body and SARS.

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO REGISTER

The Act requires that a minimum academic and practical requirments be set to register with a controlling body. Click here for the minimum requirements of SAIT.

Membership Management Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal