Print Page   |   Report Abuse
News & Press: Case Law

TC-IT 13512 JHB – (30 March 2015)

28 April 2015   (0 Comments)
Posted by: Author: Lesedi Seforo
Share |

Author: Lesedi Seforo (SAIT Technical)


This case is an appeal to the Johannesburg Tax Court and considers whether Secondary Tax on Companies ("STC”) should be levied on interest-free loans lent to the appellant, which subsequently lent to the other companies within the same group.


The appellant, ABC Pty Ltd ("ABC”), is a company that is part of the ‘X Group’. The core business of the group is the development of, and investment in, industrial and commercial property. The group comprises a trust ("X Family Trust”), which holds interests in various companies, one of which is ABC. This entity is also used as a treasury company of the X Group; effectively borrowing from lenders at an interest rate of zero per cent and then lending to the other group companies without charging interest. It thus mainly acted as a conduit in respect of these particular loan transactions. There were other interest-bearing loans which ABC had made to some of the companies within the X Group, but these did not form part of the dispute with SARS.

The Commissioner levied STC in terms of section 64B(2) read with section 64C(2)(g) in respect of the interest-free loans made by ABC to its shareholders or connected persons during the 2010 and 2011 years of assessment. Interest was also charged in terms of section 64B(9) due to the failure of ABC to pay the STC on time.

In terms of section 64C(2)(g), a deemed dividend is recognised on the amount of a loan or advance granted or made available to a shareholder or a connected person in relation to that shareholder. This provision, however, needs to be read together with section 64C(4), which excludes a number of loan transactions from being recognised as deemed dividends.

One of these exclusions is found in section 64C(4)(bA), which states:

"The provisions of subsection (2) shall not apply to the extent of any consideration received by that company in exchange for-

(i)                  the cash or asset distributed, transferred or otherwise disposed of; or

(ii)                any other benefit granted as contemplated in subsection (2);”

ABC’s main contention was essentially that the loans granted to the other group companies ought not to be recognised as deemed dividends based on this provision.  As such, no STC should be payable. On the other hand, the Commissioner’s main argument was that the 64C(4)(bA) exemption was not applicable because no consideration was received by ABC for the interest-free loans granted to its debtors.


Van Oosten J accepted the appellant’s argument, holding the following at paragraph [20] (emphasis added):

"The consideration, or quid pro quo, as correctly pointed out by counsel for the appellant, lies in the nature of the loan agreements: in essence the appellant was granted equivalent benefits in the form of the interest-free incoming loans as consideration in exchange for the amounts it loaned by way of interest-free outgoing loans. The outgoing loans matched the benefits the appellant received by way of incoming loans. It accordingly clearly constituted a quid pro quo which the appellant received in return for making the outgoing loans. Counsel for the Commissioner made much of the words ‘to the extent of any consideration received’ as militating against the appellant’s contention. The relevance thereof escapes me. The incoming and outgoing loans, by their nature, as I have alluded to, clearly qualify for the exemption.”

The appeal was therefore upheld and the disputed STC assessments issued by SARS were set aside.

Please click here to view full judgement.


Section 240A of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) requires that all tax practitioners register with a recognized controlling body before 1 July 2013. It is a criminal offense to not register with both a recognized controlling body and SARS.


The Act requires that a minimum academic and practical requirments be set to register with a controlling body. Click here for the minimum requirements of SAIT.

Membership Management Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal