Print Page   |   Report Abuse
News & Press: Opinion

Although the Tax Court is not a court of law, fundamental principles of the law of evidence apply

03 July 2015   (0 Comments)
Posted by: Author: PwC South Africa
Share |

Author: PwC South Africa

Even though the Tax Court is not ‘a court of law’ in the strict sense of the word, but a specialist tribunal with a very restricted jurisdiction, a hearing in the Tax Court must be conducted in accordance with the cardinal rules of evidence that prevail in the ordinary courts.

Thus, rule 44(2) of the rules promulgated under s 103 of the Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011 provides very concisely that –

"A party must present all evidence . . . and must adhere to the rules of evidence”.

The judgment referred to below makes an important point in this regard.

Leading questions 

It is a principle of evidence that, in a court of law, a litigant or his legal representative is not permitted to ask leading questions of his own witness, save in relation to issues that are not in dispute. 

A leading question is one that is expressed in a form that suggests the answer ("were you very angry when you saw what had happened?”) instead of expressing the question in a neutral form and leaving it to the witness to decide how to answer ("what was your reaction to what had happened?”).

Leading questions can, however, be freely put in the course of cross-examination by a litigant to a witness called by the other litigant in order to impugn the testimony the witness has given. ("You have poor eyesight, don’t you?”)

The same bar on leading questions will apply to proceedings in the Tax Court.

Thus, if the taxpayer’s representative asks leading questions of his own witnesses (including the taxpayer), the answers to those questions can be accorded little weight. In Z v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service [2014] ZATC 2,Wepener J said –

"During both his evidence in chief and in re-examination, leading questions were put to the appellant [by his own counsel] . . . The veracity of the witness’s conclusions on the very controversial issue is such that little or no reliance can be placed on the conclusions of the witness given to direct leading questions.”

A litigant or his representative will usually object if the opponent asks leading questions of his own witness and the judge will usually then rule that the question cannot be put in that form, and must be rephrased.

However, as the above quotation makes clear, if a leading question is asked of the litigant’s own witness and is answered, the answer will carry little weight.

This article first appeared on pwc.co.za.



WHY REGISTER WITH SAIT?

Section 240A of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) requires that all tax practitioners register with a recognized controlling body before 1 July 2013. It is a criminal offense to not register with both a recognized controlling body and SARS.

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO REGISTER

The Act requires that a minimum academic and practical requirments be set to register with a controlling body. Click here for the minimum requirements of SAIT.

Membership Management Software Powered by YourMembership.com®  ::  Legal