Print Page   |   Report Abuse
News & Press: Corporate Tax

New binding private ruling issued in respect of renunciation of a usufruct over shares

25 August 2015   (0 Comments)
Posted by: Author: Mareli Treurnicht
Share |

Author:  Mareli Treurnicht (DLA Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr)

On 17 August 2015 the South African Revenue Service (SARS) issued Binding Private Ruling 203 (Ruling) relating to the question as to whether securities transfer tax (STT) would be payable on the renunciation of a usufruct over shares.

The Ruling specifically dealt with the interpretation of sections 1, 2 and 5 of the Securities Transfer Tax Act No. 25 of 2007 (STT Act).

In respect of s1 of the STT Act, the Ruling pertained to the definitions of "security" and "transfer". Section 1 of the STT Act defines a "security" as:

  • any share or depository receipt in a company; or
  • any members interest in a close corporation, excluding the debt portion in respect of a share linked to a debenture.

Section 1 of the STT Act defines the term "transfer" as including the "transfer, sale, assignment or cession, or disposal in any other manner, of a security or the cancellation or redemption of that security", but excluding:

  • any event that does not result in a change in beneficial ownership;
  • any issue of a security; or
  • a cancellation or redemption of a security if the company which issued the security is being wound up, liquidated or deregistered or its corporate existence is being finally terminated.

The facts in the Ruling were as follows:

  • The applicant was a natural person and a South African tax resident (the Applicant). 
  • The co-applicants were three separate trusts formed in South Africa, and therefore South African tax residents (the Co-Applicants).
  • The Applicant was married to N, who is deceased.
  • The last will and testament of N bequeathed a share portfolio (the Shares) to the three children of the Applicant and N (the Children), with a life-long usufruct in favour of the Applicant.
  • The Children each transferred their bare dominium in the Shares to the respective Co-Applicants.
  • The Shares were administered by a broker in one account in the Applicant’s name.

The following transaction was proposed by the applicants:

  • The Applicant would renounce the usufruct over the Shares. 
  • Full ownership of the Shares would vest in the respective Co-Applicants..
  • The Shares would be transferred by the broker into accounts in the names of each of the Co-Applicants.

It should be noted that the Ruling does not set out the arguments on which the applicants relied in their application for the Ruling. However, it was ruled that STT would not be payable by the Applicant on the renunciation of the usufruct over the Shares.

This article first appeared on cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com. 


WHY REGISTER WITH SAIT?

Section 240A of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) requires that all tax practitioners register with a recognized controlling body before 1 July 2013. It is a criminal offense to not register with both a recognized controlling body and SARS.

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO REGISTER

The Act requires that a minimum academic and practical requirments be set to register with a controlling body. Click here for the minimum requirements of SAIT.

Membership Management Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal