Print Page   |   Report Abuse
News & Press: Opinion

Changes to corrections of tax assessments

28 January 2016   (3 Comments)
Posted by: Author: Fin24
Share |

Author: Fin24

In future the SA Revenue Service (SARS) will not be permitted to entertain so-called "requests for correction" of tax assessments, except if it is satisfied that there is a  "readily apparent" undisputed error in the assessment.

This is according to the Tax Administration Laws Amendment Act of 2015, which was promulgated on January 8 2016.

In the view of David Warneke, director and head of tax technical international audit, tax and advisory services company BDO South Africa, it is likely that taxpayers will be severely discriminated against by this amendment.

He pointed out that what is "readily apparent" to one person may not be so to another.

"The number of cases in which SARS is likely to grant requests for corrections is likely to drop dramatically and a lack of consistency in interpretation between SARS’ assessors may be taken as a given," said Warneke.

SARS has indicated that it will attempt to mitigate the risks presented by older requests for correction through its risk management systems.

The insertion of the phrase "readily apparent" in addition to the requirement that the error be "undisputed" is to ensure that "substantive issues are properly challenged through the objection and appeal system", according to Warneke.

In terms of the objection and appeal system, the taxpayer has only 30 business days in which to object to an assessment. A senior SARS official may extend the 30 business day period by up to 21 business days if reasonable grounds exist for the delay in lodging the objection - resulting in a maximum of 51 days in total.

The period in which an objection may be lodged may be extended by up to three years if "exceptional circumstances" exist which gave rise to the delay.

In an interpretation note SARS indicated that the term "exceptional circumstances" may be understood to be referring to a natural or human-made disaster; civil disturbance or disruption in services; a serious illness or accident or serious emotional or mental distress.

Warneke illustrates by means of an example:

Situation 1:

In the submission of his income tax return a taxpayer includes his entire remuneration as taxable. He is unaware that, since he was outside South Africa for the entire year of assessment in earning the remuneration, it should be entirely exempt from South African income tax.

He only discovers his error some months later when he discusses his circumstances with a tax adviser.

SARS may argue that, although the error would be undisputed if the facts submitted by the taxpayer are proven to be correct, the error is not "readily apparent". This is because to prove the error would involve verifying the information provided to the terms of the taxpayer’s work contract and also of verifying the period spent outside the country to the taxpayer’s passport.

No "exceptional circumstances" exist, which means that the taxpayer would be out of time in attempting to follow the objection and appeal route. As a result the taxpayer would have no available remedy.

Situation 2:

In the submission of his income tax return a taxpayer includes a capital gain arising from the disposal of his art collection. He was unaware that, since he held the art collection as a "personal use asset", the capital gain should have been disregarded.

The taxpayer discovers his error some months later in conversation with a friend.

Again SARS may argue that, although the error would be undisputed if the facts submitted by the taxpayer are proven to be correct, the error is not "readily apparent". This is because to prove the error would involve an enquiry into whether or not the taxpayer used the art collection mainly for private purposes.

No "exceptional circumstances" exist, which means that the taxpayer would be out of time in attempting to follow the objection and appeal route. As a result the taxpayer would have no available remedy.

"SARS would probably argue that in both of the above situations the taxpayer had an available remedy in that he should have objected to the assessment within 30 business days," said Warneke.

"However, the point is that in the above situations the taxpayer would be able to prove the facts with relatively little effort but in terms of the above amendment SARS may argue that the error is not 'readily apparent’ and, therefore, that it is powerless to issue a reduced assessment."

This article first appeared on fin24.com.

Comments...

Aletta Theron says...
Posted 05 February 2016
Wow, and our tax system is fair and transparent ..... obviously not. This is not acceptable and I wil fight tooth and nail to get these older assessments corrected.
Michael G. White says...
Posted 04 February 2016
SARS generally is entitled to raise an additional assessment within 3 years of the date of assessment where it has determined that a taxpayer understated his income(eg after an audit).On the other hand the taxpayer as in the above examples realises he was overtaxed but cannot claim a refund simply because the error is not readily apparent. Somehow this does not seem right and just. One wanders what would happen where a SARS audit reveals that the taxpayer was under-taxed in one year but over-taxed in another year. Applying the relevant statutory provisions entitles SARS to raise an additional assessment for omitted income but not a reduced assessment on a under-claimed deduction. Surely the Law did not intend such inequity.
Sibusiso G. Nxumalo says...
Posted 04 February 2016
I am not sure whether section 98(1)(d) of the TAA will be not applicable in the absence other remedies available to the taxpayers in these situations?

WHY REGISTER WITH SAIT?

Section 240A of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) requires that all tax practitioners register with a recognized controlling body before 1 July 2013. It is a criminal offense to not register with both a recognized controlling body and SARS.

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TO REGISTER

The Act requires that a minimum academic and practical requirments be set to register with a controlling body. Click here for the minimum requirements of SAIT.

Membership Management Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal