Print Page
News & Press: Taxbreaks

Year-End Deadline Looms For Tax-Free Property Transfers

Thursday, 20 December 2012   (0 Comments)
Posted by: Author: Irma Swanepoel
Share |

Year-End Deadline Looms For Tax-Free Property Transfers

Some last-minute advice…

When buying a home, many people opt to hold the home in the name of a corporate entity rather than in their own name. One of the main reasons for this decision is that they wanted to save on taxes.

However, since the introduction of Secondary Tax on Companies in 1993, the introduction of capital gains tax (CGT) in 2001, and the introduction of transfer duty on the sale of shares in a residential property company or trust in 2002, taxes on acquiring and disposing of a property in an entity have increased substantially.

The most prominent tax consequences of owning a property in your own name can be summarised as follows:
1. When purchasing the property, you will be responsible for the payment of transfer duty which is currently calculated on a sliding scale ranging from 3% to8% (with the first R600 000 of the purchase price being exempt), unless bought from a developer, in which case VAT and not transfer duty is paid.
2. When disposing of the property, you will be liable for CGT at a maximum effective rate of13.3%. Two very important CGT benefits of owning the property in your own name are that natural persons qualify for the annual capital gains exclusion, currently R30 000; and that you may also qualify for the primary residence exclusion, in terms of which the first R2million of the capital gain made on the disposal of your primary residence is not included in your CGT calculation.
3. On death, the property will be an asset in your estate and will be subject to estate duty at the rate of 20%, with the first R3.5million of the net value of the estate being exempt.

The most prominent tax consequences of owning property through an entity are:
1. When purchasing the property the entity will be responsible for the payment of transfer duty at the same rate as individuals as explained above.
2. On disposal of the property, the entity will be liable for CGT. The current effective CGT rate for companies and close corporations is 18.6%, and for trusts, 26.7%. Entities do not have the benefit of the annual and primary residence exclusions.
3. On distribution of the proceeds of the sale of the property from a company or close corporation to the entity's shareholders or members, the shareholders or members are liable for dividends tax at a rate of 15%.
4. On the natural person's death, there is no estate duty liability on the estate of the natural person as the property does not form an asset in the estate. However, in the case of a company or close corporation, the value of the shareholding or member’s interest becomes an estate asset if held in the natural person’s own name.

Compared with entities, individual shave the benefit of a lower effective CGT rate, the annual and primary residence CGT exclusions and, of course, no dividend tax liability. Over and above the more burdensome tax consequences of owning a home through an entity, the administration costs of managing and maintaining the entity may also become very expensive.

Owning the property in an entity has the tax benefit of no estate duty liability on the natural person's demise. Other benefits unrelated to tax, such as the protection of the property against creditors, and estate planning benefits such as preserving the property for future generations, may also play a role when deciding on the holding entity of the property. From a tax perspective, however, the benefits of holding the property in a natural person's own name seem to outweigh the benefits of holding the property in the name of an entity. Because of the changes to tax laws, SARS created an amnesty period of one year in 2002, where in residences which were owned by entities could be transferred to natural persons without incurring all the usual tax liabilities.

Unfortunately, few taxpayers availed themselves of this opportunity. In the 2009 Budget Speech, a new amnesty period was announced (starting on 1 January 2010) which allows property to be transferred free of transfer duty and dividends tax and allowing the CGT to be rolled over to the natural person transferee. After a number of amendments to the amnesty legislation, the final date for disposal of the property by the entity in order to qualify for the tax benefits is 31 December 2012.

The property to be disposed of would have to be transferred to one or more natural persons who are connected persons to the entity, and the property must have been used for domestic purposes by the connected person or persons from 11 February 2009. After transfer of the property, legislation requires that steps must be taken within six months to terminate the entity.

It is strongly recommended that if you might qualify for the tax benefits under the amnesty period, you discuss with an expert the benefits of owning the property in your own name as opposed to keeping the property registered in the name of an entity. The opportunity for saving on taxes in these circumstances may not be offered by SARS again.

Source: By Irma Swanepoel (Taxbreaks)



Section 240A of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) requires that all tax practitioners register with a recognized controlling body before 1 July 2013. It is a criminal offense to not register with both a recognized controlling body and SARS.

  • Tax Practitioner Registration Requirements & FAQ's
  • Rate Our Service

    Membership Management Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal