Print Page
News & Press: Technical & tax law questions

Preservation order in terms of sec 163 of the TAA

Monday, 17 November 2014   (0 Comments)
Posted by: Author: SAIT Technical
Share |

Author: SAIT Technical

Q: I assisted a client with its vat returns from 2009 to date. SARS has now selected certain periods for verification and we gave them everything including the contract that the vendor concluded with x to build Low costs houses. The refund was later finalised and paid into the vendor’s bank account. When the vendor utilised some money to pay my fees. Two days later, Bank y froze both my and the vendor’s account. I need your advise please.

A: To "freeze” the bank account SARS would have to get a preservation order in terms of section 163 of the Tax Administration Act.  The provisional order obtained by SARS requires confirmation by the court, whereby the taxpayer can make a case that it not be made final or have it set aside (section 163(4)).

A notice should have been sent to the taxpayer in this regard (section 165 of the Tax Administration Act).

From a practical approach, the taxpayer and you will have to contact the bank and SARS Call Centre to confirm that a preservation order applies.  If the bank cannot produce the preservation order obtained by SARS they should be instructed to "unfreeze” the account or be added as party to any legal application.  

We can only come to the conclusion that SARS would follow this approach if the employee and company are connected persons.  We would advise that you confirm whether a preservation order applies and whether the employee and employer are connected persons. 

Section 180 provides that a person is personally liable for any outstanding tax debt of the taxpayer to the extent that the person's negligence or fraud resulted in the failure to pay the tax debt if -

(a) the person controls or is regularly involved in the management of the overall financial affairs of a taxpayer; and

(b) a senior SARS official is satisfied that the person is or was negligent or fraudulent in respect of the payment of the tax debts of the taxpayer.

Disclaimer: Nothing in this query and answer should be construed as constituting tax advice or a tax opinion. An expert should be consulted for advice based on the facts and circumstances of each transaction/case. Even though great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the answer, SAIT do not accept any responsibility for consequences of decisions taken based on this query and answer. It remains your own responsibility to consult the relevant primary resources when taking a decision.



Section 240A of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (as amended) requires that all tax practitioners register with a recognized controlling body before 1 July 2013. It is a criminal offense to not register with both a recognized controlling body and SARS.

  • Tax Practitioner Registration Requirements & FAQ's
  • Rate Our Service

    Membership Management Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal